Search & Navigate                    Glossary                    Congress                    Resources & Videos                    Act                    About                    
(2021-Sep-17)
(2021-Jul-10)
(2021-Jun-23)
(2021-Jan-20)
(2020-Nov-07)
(2020-Jul-09)
(2020-Feb-15)
(2020-Jan-16)
(2019-Dec-10)
(2019-Nov-15)
(2019-Aug-14)
(2019-Jun-13)
(2019-Jun-02)
(2019-Jan-15)
(2018-Nov-09)
(2018-Jun-11)
(2018-Apr-09)
(2018-Apr-05)
(2018-Feb-28)
(2018-Feb-12)
(2017-Jun-12)
(2017-Jun-05)
(2017-May-10)
(2017-Apr-06)
(2017-Mar-23)
(2017-Jan-20)
DID YOU JUST LEARN SOMETHING?
Is it worth a dollar?
News in FiVe is free to read, but it takes time and money to publish.
If you find what we do valuable, please help us continue with a small donation every so often. Even a dollar or three makes a difference.
In return, we'll keep providing you the most relevant, understandable, and accessible news and information.
It's secure and takes only about a minute.
Thanks!
| 2021-Sep-17 | By: Barry Shatzman |
Shortly before former president Donald Trump left office, he issued an order granting six months of Secret Service protection to his adult children and three former officials in his administration, costing taxpayers $1.7 million, the Washington Post reported.
Several of the expenses involved payments to Trump's own company.
Secret Service protection normally is provided to former presidents and their spouses, as well as to their children until they turn 16. Trump's children afforded the extra protection range from their late-20s to mid-40s.
Trump's order was not published, and provided no explanation. It extended protection for:
Kushner and Mnuchin each made use of the protection while traveling to the Middle East conducting business for their private companies.
For more, read the Washington Post article.
| 2021-Jul-10  (Updated: 2021-Aug-10) | By: Barry Shatzman |
President Joe Biden has fired the head of the Social Security Administration.
Andrew Saul was appointed to the position by then president Donald Trump in 2019.
Saul is a former women's apparel executive and prominent Republican donor. He also had been a trustee at the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, a conservative think tank that has advocated cuts to Social Security benefits.
While running the agency, he was accused of causing stimulus checks to be delayed for millions of disabled Americans. He also made it more cumbersome for disabled Americans to maintain their benefits.
Saul, who fought against federal employee unions and had ended the agency's telework policy, said he would challenge the legality of his firing and would continue to work from his home in New York.
The Biden administration defended the legality of the firing. A letter from Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) cited two recent Supreme Court decisions supporting a president firing the heads of federal agencies.
On July 12, the agency revoked Saul's access to its computer system.
Saul is one of several Trump appointees that Biden has fired.
Replacement has extensive Social Security experience
Biden appointed Kilolo Kijakazi as acting commissioner until a permanent replacement is nominated. Kijakazi is a former program analyst for the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and has held leadership positions at the Urban Institute and Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP), where she specialized in Social Security and has worked to build economic security for working families.
For more, read the Washington Post article.
Click here to read the OLC letter justifying the firing of Saul.
| 2021-Jun-23 | By: Barry Shatzman |
A president can fire just about any agency head they want, according to two recent Supreme Court rulings. Even if the law says otherwise.
Several federal agencies were created by laws stating that the agency's head can be removed only for cause. The intent was to protect the agency from becoming a political tool of a president. The court ruled in both cases, however, that such a restriction violates Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution - which gives the president executive power.
In 2020, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in his majority opinion in Seila Law v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau that, "Aside from the sole exception of the Presidency, that [Constitution] scrupulously avoids concentrating power in the hands of any single individual."
Yet because some agency directors have terms longer than a president's term, some presidents may not have any opportunity to shape an agency's leadership or influence its activities. That would give the director more power than the president - which the Constitution does not allow, Roberts wrote.
The case came about when Seila Law was being investigated by the CFPB. The company sued - claiming the CFPB was an unconstitutional agency because its director could not be fired by the president. The court ruled that the agency still was constitutional, just that the president has the power to fire the director.
In a similar case in 2021, investors in mortgage-backing organizations Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac claimed in a lawsuit that the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) - which oversees the organizations - was unconstitutional because its director could not be fired without cause.
In that case - Collins v. Yellen, the court expanded a president's power to fire agency heads to agencies less powerful than the CFPB.
Click here for more about Seila Law v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Click here for more about Collins v. Yellen.
| 2021-Jan-20  (Updated: 2021-Feb-28) | By: Barry Shatzman |
President Joe Biden has leveraged a Supreme Court decision allowing a president to fire agency heads to remove controversial appointees of former President Donald Trump.
Several of the firings (or requested resignations) took place on Biden's first day as president. Others followed soon after.
One thing they had in common - they worked in deliberate opposition to the missions of the agencies they ran.
At CFPB, Kathleen Kraninger worked to reduce consumer protections
On his first day in office, Biden fired Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) director Kathleen Kraninger.
At the time Trump nominated her in 2018 to replace Mick Mulvaney as head of the CFPB, she had no prior experience in consumer protection.
During the Trump administration, fines collected from lenders for cheating consumers fell dramatically - from $12 billion under the Obama administration to less than $1 billion.
Under Kraninger, the CFPB ended a regulation protecting consumers from becoming perpetually indebted to payday lenders.
Michael Pack used Voice of America to promote Trump
Also on his first day in office, Biden fired Michael Pack, who was appointed to lead the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM) in June 2020.
Pack had been accused of using the agency's news outlets as pro-Trump platforms.
He had faced numerous ethics complaints - to the point that a federal judge issued an injunction preventing him from making personnel decisions or conducting internal investigations.
Labor Relations Board's Peter Robb undermined unions
Also on his first day in office, Biden fired Peter Robb, who Trump had appointed in 2017 to to lead the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).
As general council of the NLRB, Robb was the key government official tasked to support worker and union rights. In key NLRB cases however, he usually sided with employers - including in pandemic-related cases.
He worked to weaken the NLRB's union for the agency's own employees.
In the Ronald Reagan administration, Robb had helped Reagan defeat the air traffic controllers union.
Administrative Conference of the United States
In February 2021, Biden fired four Trump appointees to the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS). The firing included Roger Severino - who had led Trump's campaign to legalize anti-LGBT discrimination in health care.
Though the ACUS has no direct power, it provides official recommendations on the federal regulatory process. Under Trump's appointees, the agency took actions such as encouraging other agencies to limit their own abilities to enact new regulations. It encouraged cost-benefit analyses of regulations that might have intangible benefits - such as barring discrimination or limiting pollution.
Sharon Gustafson fought against LGBT rights at EEOC
In March 2021, Biden fired Sharon Gustafson from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).
Besides focusing on the rights of some religious groups over others, she fought litigation against LGBT and race discrimination.
FHFA's Mark Calabria wanted to end mortgage guarantee oversight
Mark Calabria was appointed by Trump in 2019 to serve as director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), which oversees mortgage backing companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
The agencies were placed in conservatorship of the FHFA after the 2008 economic collapse. As part of the arrangement, the organizations received billions of federal dollars so they could keep backing mortgages. In exchange, they were required to return virtually all of their profits to the government.
Calabria had been working to end the conservatorship in the three years he had remaining in his term, which would have allowed the companies' profits to be returned to investors instead. But impatient investors sued the agency anyway, claiming that the FHFA was unconstitutional because the director could not be fired by the president.
The Supreme Court agreed with the impatient investors. But rather than eliminate the agency, the court ruled that the president can fire the director. Which Biden did just hours later.
Biden named Sandra L. Thompson as acting director. Thompson oversaw consumer protection efforts at multiple federal agencies.
For more, read the Slate article.
| 2020-Nov-07 | By: Barry Shatzman |
Joe Biden has been declared the winner of the 2020 presidential election, defeating incumbent President Donald Trump.
The last day to vote was Nov. 3, though some states accepted mail-in ballots that were postmarked by then but arrived later. A large number of mail-in ballots resulted in the delay of declaring a winner.
Though news networks were unanimous in declaring Biden the winner, Trump has refused to concede. He says he plans to file lawsuits in several states won by Biden - claiming fraud. He has yet to offer any evidence for those claims.
Some close states are expected to have recounts. They have until Dec. 8 to certify their results and electors for the electoral college.
Chosen electors will meet in their state capitals on Dec. 14 to cast votes for their state's winning candidate, at which time the election results become official.
For more, read the Associated Press story.
| 2020-Jul-09  (Updated: 2020-Jul-18) | By: Rob Dennis |
The U.S. Supreme Court has rejected President Donald Trump's sweeping claims of absolute immunity in two cases.
Attorneys for Trump had argued that the president would be immune from prosecution even if he were to shoot someone in public.
President not immune from a state subpoena
In Trump v. Vance, the court ruled that a New York state prosecutor can obtain Trump's financial records as part of a criminal investigation.
Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance subpoenaed financial data from Trump's businesses in connection with possible financial crimes committed by Trump's organization spanning 10 years. The investigation also included potentially illegal payments made by Trump's 2016 presidential campaign.
In his majority opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts said Trump's argument that he cannot be subpoenaed in a criminal case "runs up against the 200 years of precedent establishing that Presidents, and their official communications, are subject to judicial process."
The ruling does not necessarily make the records available to the New York investigation. The Supreme Court remanded the case to the district court, where Trump may make further arguments about the subpoena.
Even if the records are made available, the public is unlikely to see them due to grand jury secrecy rules.
Congressional subpoenas of president threaten balance of powers
Trump v. Mazars concerned Congress's ability to subpoena a president's personal records.
The House Oversight, Financial Services, and Intelligence committees had subpoenaed Trump's financial records from Mazars USA - his accounting firm - and Deutsche Bank. The House says the records are needed to determine the need for tougher laws on ethics and financial crimes.
The court ruled that lower courts must take into account separation of powers concerns in such cases.
In his majority opinion, Roberts set out a balancing test for courts weighing congressional subpoenas for the president's personal information:
The case again was remanded for further proceedings.
For more, read the Vox story.
| 2020-Feb-15  (Updated: 2020-Feb-28) | By: Barry Shatzman |
President Donald Trump has pardoned 11 people - most of whom were convicted of some form of corruption and all of whom have a connection to Trump or his associates.
Pardons included...
Additional pardons where granted to Crystal Munoz and Tynice Hall - both convicted of drug charges.
For more, read the New York Times story.
Click here to read more about Trump's pardons.
| 2020-Jan-16 | By: Barry Shatzman |
When the Trump administration withheld military aid from Ukraine it violated the law, according to the Government Accountability Office (GAO).
The 1974 Impoundment Control Act (ICA) requires presidents to spend money consistent with how Congress allocates it. While a president may delay or withhold an appropriation, it must be done in coordination with Congress as specified by the law.
In this case, Congress was not notified of the reason that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) held up the money. In fact, the Department of Defense (DoD) previously had set a schedule to provide the aid.
"Faithful execution of the law does not permit the President to substitute his own policy priorities for those that Congress has enacted into law. In fact, Congress was concerned about exactly these types of withholdings when it enacted and later amended the ICA," the ruling states.
The decision has no practical impact. The only remedy for violations of the ICA is for Congress to sue the administration to release the funds. By the time of the GAO ruling, the aid had been restored.
The administrations of Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Barack Obama all were determined to have violated the ICA during their administrations.
For more, read the Washington Post story.
Click here to read the GAO report.
| 2019-Dec-10  (Updated: 2019-Dec-12) | By: Rob Dennis |
The Justice Department has found that the FBI was justified in launching an investigation into the Donald Trump campaign's ties to Russia
The Justice Department's Office of the Inspector General (OIG) examined more than a million documents and interviewed more than 100 witnesses to compile the 476-page report into the investigation named Crossfire Hurricane.
The report did reveal "numerous serious errors" in the FBI's applications under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) to obtain warrants to conduct surveillance on Trump campaign aide Carter Page.
It also noted that the FBI was unable to confirm the most serious allegations in the dossier compiled by former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele - and found two of them were not true.
It concluded, however, that there was no political bias in the investigation.
No politically motivated witch hunt
The report states...
"(The investigation) was opened for an authorized investigative purpose and with sufficient factual predication. We did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper motivation influenced the decisions to open the four individual investigations [into Trump aides Page, Michael Flynn, Paul Manafort, and George Papadopoulos]."
Trump continually has criticized FBI agent Peter Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page, claiming leaked texts showed they were hostile to Trump's campaign, and that this proved political bias led to the investigation.
According to the report, however, Strzok "was not the sole, or even the highest-level, decision maker" involved. Page played no role in the decision to launch the investigation.
Other conspiracy theories debunked by the report
The "Steele dossier" played no role in launching the FBI investigation.
Instead, the FBI launched the investigation at the end of July 2016 after receiving information about Trump campaign aide Papadopoulos from an Australian diplomat.
This had been widely reported for the past two years, and was confirmed by the Mueller report.
Mysterious professor was not an FBI agent.
Joseph Mifsud, the Kremlin-connected professor who told Papadopoulos that Russia had "dirt" on Trump's opponent Hillary Clinton, was not an FBI agent - as Papadopoulos and others have claimed without evidence.
The FBI never planted spies in Trump's campaign.
The FBI sent four confidential human sources (CHSs) and a few undercover employees (UCEs) to speak to Page, Papadopoulos and a high-level Trump campaign official who was not a subject of the investigation. But it never embedded spies in the Trump campaign
Obama never had Trump's "wires tapped".
In March 2017, Trump claimed President Barack Obama "had my 'wires tapped' in Trump Tower." Trump never offered any evidence for his wiretapping allegation, and the report mentions no such surveillance.
The report says FBI investigators initially considered applying for a FISA warrant to conduct surveillance of Papadopoulos , but ultimately did not. They also decided not to seek FISA surveillance of Manafort or Flynn
Only one member of the Trump campaign ever was placed under electronic surveillance - Carter Page, who was the subject of an existing counterintelligence investigation because of previous contacts with Russian intelligence, "as well as Page's financial, political, and business ties to the Russian government," the report says.
The FBI did not seek this FISA warrant until October 2016 - after Page already had left the Trump campaign amid allegations that he had communicated with top Russian officials.
Several problems in obtaining Carter Page FISA warrants
In obtaining FISA warrants to investigate Carter Page, the FBI's application contained "numerous serious factual errors and omissions."
Among other things, the warrant application selectively included statements made by Page to an FBI confidential source - including those that bolstered the theory that Page was an agent of Russia while omitting others that were inconsistent with that theory.
It also omitted information that Page had been approved as an "operational contact" for another government agency from 2008 to 2013, and that he "had provided information to the other agency concerning his prior contacts with certain Russian intelligence officers."
Though the "Steele dossier" did not play a role in starting the investigation into Trump's ties with Russia, it played a key role in obtaining warrants against Page. The report documented several problems with Steele's information, including inaccuracies, omissions, and information that could not be corroborated.
The report concluded that, despite the mistakes made, there was no evidence that the FISA warrants were politically influenced.
Click here to read the OIG report
| 2019-Nov-15  (Updated: 2019-Dec-05) | By: Barry Shatzman |
President Donald Trump has pardoned three people accused or convicted of war crimes.
Clint Lorance gave illegal order to kill
First Lt. Clint Lorance was convicted of ordering his troops in Afghanistan to shoot and kill Afghan men on motorcycles. The shooting violated the military's rules of engagement, and Lorance tried to cover up the action.
Matthew Golsteyn was pardoned before he could be tried
Maj. Matthew Golsteyn was charged with premeditated murder for ambushing an Afghan man who had been released from custody in 2010. His pardon comes before the case was tried.
Edward Gallagher attorneys had close Trump connections
Chief Petty Officer Edward Gallagher had been charged with stabbing to death a teenage prisoner of war in Iraq. He was acquitted for the murder, but convicted of posing with the corpse. He was demoted. Trump's pardon restored his higher rank.
Trump previously had ordered the military to revoke commendations awarded to the case's prosecutors.
Task & Purpose had reported In May that three members of Gallagher's defense team have close ties to Trump, including Trump personal attorney Marc Mukasey.
At one point during Gallagher's hearing, Mukasey - who was present over the phone - dropped from the hearing to attend court proceedings regarding Trump's banking records.
Other longtime Trump associates making up part of Gallagher's defense team were Bernard Kerik and Tim Parlatore.
Parlatore previously had represented Fox News commentator Pete Hegseth, who had been lobbying Trump to pardon Gallagher. Parlatore has acknowledged discussing the case with Hegseth.
For more, read this Military Times story and this Politico story.
Click here to read the White House announcement.
| 2019-Aug-14 | By: Barry Shatzman |
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) is set to fire hundreds of scientists from two of the agency's primary research departments.
More than half of the 171 employees of the Economic Research Service (ERS) and two-thirds of the 224 employees of the National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) will be let go.
The reason? They refused to relocate from Washington, D.C. to Kansas City, having been given only a month's notice about the move. They were not told which Kansas City - Kansas or Missouri - they would be working in.
USDA Secretary Sonny Perdue announced the move of the two agencies in mid-June. Approximately 400 employees were given until July 15 to agree to move to the undeclared state by Sept. 30.
Departments among the top government research groups
The ERS studies the effects of government policies on farms. One such study found that, while the wealthiest households would realize the biggest reductions in their taxes from the tax law passed in 2017, taxes on poorest farm households actually would increase.
White House calls scientists' firing "draining the swamp"
Acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney told a crowd at a Republican event that the move is one of the easiest ways to "drain the swamp".
"By simply saying to people, 'You know what, we're going to take you outside the bubble, outside the Beltway, outside this liberal haven of Washington, D.C., and move you out in the real part of the country,' and they quit - what a wonderful way to sort of streamline government, and do what we haven't been able to do for a long time," Mulvaney said.
For more, read the Washington Post story.
| 2019-Jun-13  (Updated: 2019-Jun-29) | By: Barry Shatzman |
The House Oversight and Reform Committee has subpoenaed "Counselor to the President" Kellyanne Conway after she failed to testify about ethics law violations.
For more, read the New York Times story.
She has repeatedly violated the law that prohibits federal employees from participating in political campaigns as part of their official duties, according to the Office of Special Counsel (OSC).
The OSC - the federal agency that investigates violations of the Hatch Act - listed instances in which Conway issued partisan attacks against several Democratic Party presidential candidates. She did so both in White House media interviews and on her Twitter account - even though she serves as a spokesperson for the Trump administration and uses that Twitter account for official activities.
"Each of these actions constitutes a a violation of the Hatch Act's prohibition on the use of official authority to interfere with or affect an election," the OSC report states.
Conway reacts with disdain
The OSC recommended that Conway be fired from the Trump administration - both because of her actions and her disdain for the law itself.
The OSC previously had warned both Conway and the administration about Hatch Act violations regarding her Twitter account and offered assistance, the report states.
"But Ms. Conway did not take any noticeable steps to bring her Twitter account into compliance with the law," it added.
During a press conference, Conway
"Ms. Conway's violations, if left unpunished, sends a message to all federal employees that they need not abide by the Hatch Act's restrictions," Special Counsel Henry J. Kemer wrote in the report's cover letter to Trump.
Trump has blocked her from testifying.
Did Trump's son-in-law also violate the Hatch Act?
Reps. Don Beyer and Ted Lieu have asked the OSC also to investigate whether Jared Kushner has been engaging in campaign activity from the White House. That also would violate the Hatch Act.
Click here to read the OSC press release.
Click here to read the OSC report.
| 2019-Jun-02 | By: Barry Shatzman |
In 2017, when Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao was planning her first visit to China for the Trump administration, she requested that family members be included in meetings with Chinese officials.
When the request was questioned by the State Department, Chao canceled the trip.
Chao's family runs American shipping company Foremost Group.Though Chao has no formal role in Foremost Group, the company does much of its business with Chinese industry. Chao has used connections to Chinese government officials to help the company.
As Secretary of Transportation, Chao has proposed cuts in programs that would help the U.S. maritime industry. Her family, on the other hand, has provided financial support to China's industry.
That isn't her only family conflict of interest.
Chao is married to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. They have received millions of dollars from Chao's family - both in gifts and contributions to McConnell's Senate campaigns.
McConnell has been a Republican Party leader in the Senate since 2003. In 2004, his net worth was approximately $3 million. In 2015, it was more than $26 million.
His annual Senate salary is approximately $200,000.
For more, read the New York Times report.
| 2019-Jan-15 | By: (External links) |
Judge Orders Trump Administration To Remove 2020 Census Citizenship Question
| 2018-Nov-09 | By: (External links) |
| 2018-Jun-11 | By: (External links) |
| 2018-Apr-09 | By: Rob Dennis |
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Scott Pruitt is under investigation for alleged mishandling of taxpayer money and acceptance of perks, including a bargain condo rental tied to a lobbyist with business before the agency.
During his first months in Washington, D.C., Pruitt rented a condo from the wife of a prominent energy lobbyist for $50 a night, only paying for the nights he stayed there. While Pruitt was renting the condo, the EPA approved a pipeline-expansion plan by one of the lobbyist's clients.
In addition, Pruitt:
Under Pruitt's leadership, the EPA used a provision of the Safe Drinking Water Act to give massive raises to two of Pruitt's closest aides, political appointees who had previously worked for him in Oklahoma. The provision is intended to be used to hire experts quickly. Pruitt denied all knowledge of the raises, and EPA chief of staff Ryan Jackson claimed responsibility for them. The same provision was used to hire a former chemical industry lobbyist to run the EPA's Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention.
For more, read the CNN story.
| 2018-Apr-05  (Updated: 2018-Apr-21) | By: Barry Shatzman |
Mick Mulvaney, the acting director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), requested in January that the CFBP receive no funding. He said the "reserve fund" the bureau had built up for overruns or emergencies should be used up before asking for more money.
He seems to be trying to speed up that process - hiring deputies and paying them salaries that exceed normal pay for their role. Five deputies he hired are being paid approximately $250,000 annually. Two of Mulvaney's hires were for positions that did not exist under previous director Richard Cordray, according the Associated Press.
That's about the same as the vice president. In Congress, only the House Speaker makes more than $200,000. Cabinet members make approximately $200,000.
Leandra English, who was chief of staff for Cordray, made less than $215,000. Kirsten Mork - English's successor under Mulvaney - makes about $45,000 more than that. English now is the deputy director, but the CFPB refused to disclose her current salary to the Associated Press.
In spite of the boosted payroll, the CFPB is doing much less for American consumers than it did under Cordray.
For more, read the Associated Press story.
| 2018-Feb-28 | By: Rob Dennis |
More than 30 White House staffers, including President Donald Trump's son-in-law and senior adviser Jared Kushner, have been stripped of their top-secret clearances.
The staffers had never been approved for permanent clearances. They were provided interim clearances while their applications were being evaluated. They were downgraded to secret on Feb. 23 - when White House Chief of Staff John Kelly instituted a new policy forbidding temporary top-level clearances.
Kelly's policy change came after it emerged that Staff Secretary Rob Porter, who had access to some of the nation's most sensitive secrets, held an interim security clearance for more than a year despite allegations of spousal abuse. Porter resigned earlier in February.
Kushner, whose vast responsibility has included negotiating foreign trade deals and exploring a Middle East peace process, also held an interim clearance for more than a year. His ability to perform in these roles without a top-secret clearance will be impaired - if not rendered impossible.
Kushner's security problems
Kushner's problems obtaining a permanent clearance date to the beginning of the Trump presidency, when he failed to disclose more than 100 foreign contacts on his security clearance application.
Among those contacts were December 2016 meetings with Russian ambassador to the United States Sergey Kislyak and the head of Russian state-controlled bank Vnesheconombank (VEB), Sergey Gorkov. VEB was placed under U.S. sanctions after Russia annexed Crimea in 2014.
A Russian spy ring operated out of the bank's Manhattan branch from 2012 to 2014, and a member of that ring met with Trump campaign foreign policy adviser Carter Page in 2013. Gorkov, a graduate of the FSB Academy, was appointed head of VEB in 2016 by Russian President Vladimir Putin, who used to chair the bank himself.
Kushner also took part in a June 2016 meeting at Trump Tower with a Russian lawyer promising dirt on Trump opponent Hillary Clinton.
As a White House staffer, Kushner continued holding undisclosed meetings with foreign officials, the Washington Post reported. Officials in four countries - China, Israel, Mexico and the United Arab Emirates - discussed ways to manipulate Kushner "by taking advantage of his complex business arrangements, financial difficulties and lack of foreign policy experience," the Post reported.
Other clearance problems among Trump staff members
As of November, 100 staffers in the Executive Office of the President still had interim clearances, including Kushner and his wife, Ivanka Trump, CNN reported.
The remaining officials whose clearances were downgraded have not been named. They remain in the White House for now, but their duties requiring a top-secret clearance will be handed off to other staffers.
Six other White House staffers were fired in February after they failed an FBI background check.
For more, read the Bloomberg News story.
To learn about Chinese efforts to exploit Kushner, read this article in The New Yorker.
| 2018-Feb-12 | By: Barry Shatzman |
The Trump administration is proposing the elimination of an agency created to ease racial tensions and reduce hate crimes.
The Community Relations Service (CRS) was created by the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
It is part of the Department of Justice (DOJ). The administration's proposal would eliminate the agency's $15 million budget (and 54 jobs) and transfer the its functions to the DOJ's Civil Rights Division .
The difference could be more than administrative, however. The Community Relations Service operates as a mediator, whereas the Civil Rights Division is concerned with enforcement.
The White House proposal is only a proposal. Congress would be required to approve the elimination of the agency's budget.
For more, read the BuzzFeed News story.
| 2017-Jun-12 | By: Barry Shatzman |
Rep. Mike Quigley has introduced a bill that would classify social media posts by a president to be considered official presidential records.
President Trump frequently has issued public policy declarations over the social media platform Twitter. At times it is difficult to determine which posts are serious or which merely are Trump using social media as an outlet to vent.
Press Secretary Sean Spicer has said they should be taken as official statements.
Quigley states in a press release for the bill...
"President Trump's frequent, unfiltered use of his personal Twitter account as a means of official communication is unprecedented. If the President is going to take to social media to make sudden public policy proclamations, we must ensure that these statements are documented and preserved for future reference."
The bill is the Communications Over Various Feeds Electronically For Engagement (COVFEFE), named after a seemingly nonsensical word in a Twitter post by Trump.
For more, read The Hill story.
| 2017-Jun-05 | By: Rob Dennis |
The Trump administration has picked a firm to modernize veterans' electronic health care records - without putting the contract out for bid or knowing how much it will cost.
Veterans Affairs (VA) Secretary David Shulkin announced that the contract will go to Cerner Corp., which already has a $4.3 billion contract to overhaul the Department of Defense's (DoD) health care records system. The VA won't use the same system, but it will use Cerner's software at its core, Shulkin said. Cerner won the DoD contract in a two-year bidding process.
Federal contracts typically are subject to a competitive bidding process to lower costs and avoid conflicts of interest. However, agencies can waive that process, and Shulkin said he did so "because of the urgency and the critical nature of this decision."
This leaves the government with little leverage over the cost. It could choose to abandon the deal and start over, but that could delay the project more than a bidding process from the start would have.
The VA still must present its justification for awarding the contract without competition.
For more, read the McClatchy story.
Click here to read the statement from the VA.
| 2017-May-10 | By: Barry Shatzman |
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has removed information related to climate change from its website.
To find the EPA's climate change section on their site, you need to go through the following path...
EPA.gov -> Environmental Topics -> Air -> (Air Pollutants) Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions -> Climate Change Home
The section now contains a simple message...
"Thank you for your interest in this topic. We are currently updating our website to reflect EPA's priorities under the leadership of President Trump and Administrator Pruitt. If you're looking for an archived version of this page, you can find it on the January 19 snapshot."
Selecting the archived version will lead you to the old page (which no longer is being updated).
Comparison of EPA Climate Change web pages past and present
The EPA claims the full site will be available in the archive. However, there had been an accompanying student site with resources used by teachers as well as students. The EPA suggested those pages might not have been archived properly.
Click here to read the EPA statement regarding the change.
For more, read the Climate Central story.
| 2017-Apr-06 | By: Barry Shatzman |
The Secret Service is pulling agents off criminal investigations in order to help protect President Trump and his family, the New York Times has reported.
To pay for the protection, the Secret Service has requested an extra $60 million.
For more, read the New York Times story.
| 2017-Mar-23 | By: Barry Shatzman |
Rep. Mike Quigley has introduced a bill that would require presidents to disclose the names of visitors to the White House. Presidents also would be required to provide a visitors' log for any other places they regularly conduct official U.S. business.
The only administration to voluntarily provide this information was the Obama administration.
The bill is the Make Access Records Available to Lead American Government Openness Act. It forms the acronym MAR-A-LAGO. Mar-a-Lago is the name of the Florida resort owned by President Donald Trump where he has spent a significant amount of time conducting official U.S. business.
For more, read this Mother Jones story and The Independent story.
Click here for more information on the MAR-A-LAGO act.
| 2017-Jan-20 | By: Barry Shatzman |
The first change of the Trump administration happened quickly - before the new president even finished his inauguration speech.
The White House website changed over from President Barack Obama to President Trump virtually immediately after Trump's noon eastern time swearing in.
A few things were noticeably missing from the new administration's site - including a report on civil rights, a report on LGBT and transexual issues in the workplace, and the Obama administration's detailed report on climate change.
The Obama administration website has been archived, and is available at ObamaWhiteHouse.archives.gov.
Specifically...
Click here to view the Obama administration's report on climate change.
Click here to view the Obama administration's report on civil rights.
Click here to view the Obama administration's record on social issues.
The Department of Labor's report on LGBT workplace rights still is available on the department's website. We have archived it, and will make it available if this copy is removed.